Thank you Bishop Strickland for supporting us faithful and encouraging us to stay strong. We must all put on the armor of God and be ready to suffer more and joyfully. Im praying, also, for the faithful in SC who have lost their Tridentine Masses🙏🏻 In JMJ🤍
They sang a new church into being at Vatican 2. Created a new religion and new “Mass” that is not God centered, but man centered. True Catholicism is not found in the Novus Ordo. Just look at the demon of a “bishop” in Charlotte. If you want to learn where to find the true faith, and what is needed to return the church to its true core beliefs and dogmas and doctrines, you need to check out my YouTube channel. There are several playlists which are numbered in the order of correct viewing. Go here and learn:
To believe that is to believe that the verses from Matthew which Bishop Strickland quoted are a lie.
The Church cannot be in apostasy. To separate oneself from the Church, including its counsels, is to declare oneself a Protestant, and to declare that “I know better than the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium of the Holy Roman Church.
Please take a break from those who are leading you into error, and rejoin Bishop Strickland in the Church.
And don’t mistake the lies told by those who supposedly brought the Second Vatican Council to the people of the world for the teachings of the Council. Read the documents. R e a d them. And you’ll realize that the problem isn’t with the Council. The problem, as it always is, is with the folks who don’t want the Truth to be true, as instead spout lies.
That is completely incorrect. I have read the documents. You clearly haven’t heard of Our Lady of La Salette. That’s where those words come from. The Novus Ordo was cobbled together by a 33rd degree Freemason and 6 Protestant ministers, a provable fact, see the Realities of Vatican 2 playlist on my channel. You know what that makes the Novus Ordo? Heretical. Vatican 2 teaches things in the documents that are 180 degree polar opposites of what the church taught previous to Vatican 2. Ecumenism- heretical. Collegiality - heretical. Religious liberty - heretical.
If you’re not just some brainwashed Novus Ordite you’ll go look at the evidence. It’s all there. I have the receipts.
Vatican I was a farce, incomplete and interrupted by war and worldwide disruption and was obsessed by anti-modernism to the neglect of all other issues. They had drawn up documents in secret planning to have them waved through without proper scrutiny and unopposed.
Vatican II correctly threw out all the drafts which were presented by the tunnel-visioned insiders of the time and a thorough and hugely representative gathering of faithful believers delivered the best discussions and arrived at the best summaries of the Christian faith cleansed of all sorts of cultural accretions of centuries: all done in the open and all clearly connected to the faith of apostolic times and cleansed of dusty superstitions and additions.
This reminds me of an acerbic joke related to me by a Southern Baptist friend, about a group of Baptists who "meet to meet to agree to meet." Synodality. It's not for everyone.
I looked up the word "synod" and then I looked up the word "synodality" and it seems to be a made up word. The suffix "ality" essentially means "the quality of" which made me think somebody just shoved a suffix where it did not belong.
Thank you for your clarity and dedication to the teachings of our Church. It is what centers me in the catechism that I was taught while in the midst of the confusion of today.
Christ is the Way, the Truth and the Life. The synodal path is not the Way of Christ. Those who try to lead us on that path are misleading us. Thankyou Bishop Strickland. James Roberts, London.
Where did this idea of a "synodal path" even come from? The Pope and the Magisterium should seek guidance only from God, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. That's also where he laity should look to for guidance. Is this "synodal path" to appease some displeased people over Church teachings? If those people don't believe in the teachings of the Catholic Church, our deposit of faith, they can go be in some other ecclesial structure. If people don't like our teaching on divorce and remarriage, they can go be Anglican. Plenty of heresies to choose from. This "synodal path" seems to me is a sign that the current heirarchical clergy don't have confidence that Our Holy Mother Church has Jesus's teachings. They aren't guardians of the deposit of faith. They are trying to "manage" the Church by "committee" in some semblance of "democracy" as if the Truth were to be obtained by majority rule. The Truth has already been revealed and He is Jesus Christ and we are His Church. Why He's allowing all this crap to happen, I don't know. He's the One with Omniscience, Omnipotence, and Omnibenevolence. So ask Him.
Would Pope Leo’s interpretation of synodality be more palatable and properly rooted in doctrine than that of Pope Francis?
I would hope so. Perhaps, he understands the “long game” Francis had in mind. Let us continue to pray🙏for the guidance of the Holy Spirit during this period of transition. We cannot allow the devil to arrest the process and take control of the necessary work Pope Leo must do.🙏
Ave Maria, Bishop Strickland! Thank you for your bold witness!
Thank you Bishop Strickland for supporting us faithful and encouraging us to stay strong. We must all put on the armor of God and be ready to suffer more and joyfully. Im praying, also, for the faithful in SC who have lost their Tridentine Masses🙏🏻 In JMJ🤍
Thank you, Bishop Strickland. We need more like you.
Thank you Bishop Strickland! May God Bless you🙏
They sang a new church into being at Vatican 2. Created a new religion and new “Mass” that is not God centered, but man centered. True Catholicism is not found in the Novus Ordo. Just look at the demon of a “bishop” in Charlotte. If you want to learn where to find the true faith, and what is needed to return the church to its true core beliefs and dogmas and doctrines, you need to check out my YouTube channel. There are several playlists which are numbered in the order of correct viewing. Go here and learn:
https://youtube.com/@thewizionary1?si=IEIfceuREc9K0OuS
Rome is in apostasy, and has been since the “synthesis of all heresies”, aka modernism, came into the church. Oremus!
No.
To believe that is to believe that the verses from Matthew which Bishop Strickland quoted are a lie.
The Church cannot be in apostasy. To separate oneself from the Church, including its counsels, is to declare oneself a Protestant, and to declare that “I know better than the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium of the Holy Roman Church.
Please take a break from those who are leading you into error, and rejoin Bishop Strickland in the Church.
And don’t mistake the lies told by those who supposedly brought the Second Vatican Council to the people of the world for the teachings of the Council. Read the documents. R e a d them. And you’ll realize that the problem isn’t with the Council. The problem, as it always is, is with the folks who don’t want the Truth to be true, as instead spout lies.
That is completely incorrect. I have read the documents. You clearly haven’t heard of Our Lady of La Salette. That’s where those words come from. The Novus Ordo was cobbled together by a 33rd degree Freemason and 6 Protestant ministers, a provable fact, see the Realities of Vatican 2 playlist on my channel. You know what that makes the Novus Ordo? Heretical. Vatican 2 teaches things in the documents that are 180 degree polar opposites of what the church taught previous to Vatican 2. Ecumenism- heretical. Collegiality - heretical. Religious liberty - heretical.
If you’re not just some brainwashed Novus Ordite you’ll go look at the evidence. It’s all there. I have the receipts.
But I won’t hold my breath.
Vatican I was a farce, incomplete and interrupted by war and worldwide disruption and was obsessed by anti-modernism to the neglect of all other issues. They had drawn up documents in secret planning to have them waved through without proper scrutiny and unopposed.
Vatican II correctly threw out all the drafts which were presented by the tunnel-visioned insiders of the time and a thorough and hugely representative gathering of faithful believers delivered the best discussions and arrived at the best summaries of the Christian faith cleansed of all sorts of cultural accretions of centuries: all done in the open and all clearly connected to the faith of apostolic times and cleansed of dusty superstitions and additions.
Spoken like a true Novus Ordo heretic. Go to my YouTube channel and learn the truth.
A synod is a church meeting. A synod on synodality is a church meeting on the quality of church meetings. How lame is that?
This reminds me of an acerbic joke related to me by a Southern Baptist friend, about a group of Baptists who "meet to meet to agree to meet." Synodality. It's not for everyone.
I looked up the word "synod" and then I looked up the word "synodality" and it seems to be a made up word. The suffix "ality" essentially means "the quality of" which made me think somebody just shoved a suffix where it did not belong.
Go forth and synod no more!
I totally agree with you, Bishop Strickland. I am sickened by the “synodal way.”
Why
Thank you for your clarity and dedication to the teachings of our Church. It is what centers me in the catechism that I was taught while in the midst of the confusion of today.
Thank you Dear Bishop, let’s pray that Pope Leo XIV re-visits the Sistine Chapel daily and looks up for guidance 🙏🙏
Deo gratias!
Christ is the Way, the Truth and the Life. The synodal path is not the Way of Christ. Those who try to lead us on that path are misleading us. Thankyou Bishop Strickland. James Roberts, London.
Where did this idea of a "synodal path" even come from? The Pope and the Magisterium should seek guidance only from God, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. That's also where he laity should look to for guidance. Is this "synodal path" to appease some displeased people over Church teachings? If those people don't believe in the teachings of the Catholic Church, our deposit of faith, they can go be in some other ecclesial structure. If people don't like our teaching on divorce and remarriage, they can go be Anglican. Plenty of heresies to choose from. This "synodal path" seems to me is a sign that the current heirarchical clergy don't have confidence that Our Holy Mother Church has Jesus's teachings. They aren't guardians of the deposit of faith. They are trying to "manage" the Church by "committee" in some semblance of "democracy" as if the Truth were to be obtained by majority rule. The Truth has already been revealed and He is Jesus Christ and we are His Church. Why He's allowing all this crap to happen, I don't know. He's the One with Omniscience, Omnipotence, and Omnibenevolence. So ask Him.
Would Pope Leo’s interpretation of synodality be more palatable and properly rooted in doctrine than that of Pope Francis?
I would hope so. Perhaps, he understands the “long game” Francis had in mind. Let us continue to pray🙏for the guidance of the Holy Spirit during this period of transition. We cannot allow the devil to arrest the process and take control of the necessary work Pope Leo must do.🙏
Nathaniel asked, “Can anything good come out of Nazareth” (John 1:46)?
I ask “can any good come out of Chicago?” Obama? Bernardin? Cupich? Now this “lion?”
Oh my
Thank you Bishop Strickland.