I love you Bishop Strickland. Thank you for being OUR BISHOP. The Lord has rewards for those like you willing to lose all and die for Him! I'm praying for you every day!
God love you, Bishop Strickland. Thank you for crying out the truth and calling your brother bishops and the faithful to task. May you be blessed and strengthened for the fight to come!
The synod is a dumpster fire of bad and manipulated theology all driven by a purely political agenda that emanates from the Francis minions. The USCCB is in "hopefully it will pass over" mode and again exhibits the spine of an earthworm. They may keep their mitres and croziers but they risk losing something else that is infinitely more valuable. We need clarity from the shepherd's. They are to go forth and protect the church from the wolves of the night, not wait and see what happens.
It was a blessing to hear you read this most excellent letter today in Baltimore. May it reach the hearts and minds of your brother bishops! Saints Nathaniel and Jude, pray for us.
Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò explains what is and what is not a schism: “Schism is a sin against the unity of the Church. It is carried out at the moment when a baptized person refuses to submit to the authority of the Roman Pontiff and to remain in the communion of faith and charity of the Catholic Church.
But what happens if on the Chair of Peter there is – instead of a Pope who defends and governs the Church – there is a usurper who systematically demolishes her, and who is chosen and appointed by fraud by the St Gallen Mafia for this very purpose? The Catholic Church is presently occupied by an extraneous body that superimposes itself on her and obscures her, similar to an eclipse: this extraneous body is not the Church, but the anti-church of the False Prophet, and as such it is not possible to be in communion with it.”
The Archbishop points to the position of contemporary Catholics who have become hostages of the apostate Bergoglio. After the release of the Fiducia supplicans declaration, they found themselves in a synodal counterfeit of the Catholic Church proclaiming a sodomite antigospel: “Catholics belong to the Catholic Church, not to its conciliar and synodal counterfeit of which Bergoglio is the head. It is Bergoglio who is in a state of schism with the Church of which he claims to be Pope, and as a heretic and schismatic he does not have nor can he exercise any power, nor demand any obedience.”
Archbishop Viganò speaks about the abuse of the ecclesiastical courts: “I reiterate, however, that the use of the judiciary for political purposes that we witness in the civil sphere, especially in the United States of America, is mirrored in the ecclesiastical sphere through instrumental and specious canonical sanctions.”
The Archbishop points to the precedent-setting and invalid punishment Bergoglio is using to intimidate other bishops and priests into silence: “The excommunication against me, even if manifestly invalid and null and void, constitutes a form of repression of dissent and should serve as a deterrent for others. I am convinced that I would have gravely failed in my duties as Bishop and Successor of the Apostles if I had continued to remain silent, as unfortunately all my confreres do.”
The Archbishop shows that Satan’s influence is most effective when he can abuse official structures: “I would like to draw attention to a fundamental and very important element. We must understand that ‘the masterstroke of Satan’, the sworn enemy of the Church, has occurred by his appropriating authority and abusing the power connected with her, so that his disintegrating action has had all the appearances of at least formal legality.”
Archbishop Viganò compares the Second Vatican Council to a timed mine: “The Second Vatican Council was to be the juridical instrument with which to place the dynamite at the very foundation of the Church, and then detonate it later. It had to look like a Council, it had to give the idea of having the same authority as the Council of Nicaea or Trent, but at the same time it could not define as truths to be believed any heresies that the Magisterium had already condemned.”
Archbishop Viganò emphasizes the Council’s method of covertly promoting heresies, namely the ambiguity of terms: “Thus those errors were insinuated by means of equivocation – deliberately imprecise formulations which at the right moment could serve as a basis on which to implement the revolution. People continue to speak of ‘the Council’, but we should have the honesty to recognize that for the ‘conciliar church’ born with Vatican II there is only one ‘council’, which surpasses in authority and importance all the other twenty ecumenical councils of the Catholic Church. The anomaly is represented by this Council, because it was used for a subversive purpose, under the formal appearance of a solemn act of the Church and with the authoritativeness (as well as the authority) of the Pope and the Council Fathers.”
Archbishop Viganò reveals that the Second Vatican Council created the preconditions for the current Bergoglian revolution within the Church and for the transformation of the Church into a New Age anti-church. It is a Masonic project: “The purpose of Vatican II was to create the doctrinal premises – not necessarily explicit and indeed often hidden in ambiguous formulations – to revolutionize the Church, Protestantizing and secularizing her, so as to be able to ferry her towards the syncretistic union of all religions. And this is the project of Freemasonry: the ecumenical and inclusive Religion of Humanity.”
Thank you for this. Given the priests were given the power to bind and the power to release, and none of us wants to be stuck in hell for doing the right thing and being condemned by a heretical pope, it's good to know he's simply not Pope anymore. Of course, it seemed illogical, but it was a question I had.
bellarmine says anyone who is a formal heretic is automatically excommunicated. thus no heretic, a non-catholic, can be pope. you increase the effect of his sin and apostasy by denying this. logic and tradition should take you one step further to defend the faith.
May this note find us all ever closer to God, and His Peace.
I find Sedeprivationism pretty convincing, it applies to many Church leaders and the Pope. Taking Offices when intending to Betray the duties and oaths, the Church and all of us.
Why do you think I believe that he has the Holy Ghost near, or the Charismas, or Grace that normally he would get when accepting the Papal Office? He is a Modernist, spreading that poison to damage us and the Traditional Catholic Church - after all.
Careful where in the water you dive, you might be wrong and sin.
I ask sedepr this, and get no answer: suppose Jorge renounces all his errors and heresies to the world… I would still reject him as a non Catholic who won Conclave, which means he's an ineligible papal claimant.
i lector at a church in NY and have in past supported Cardinal Dolan's Annual Appeal. in the meantime over these years i have also phoned or emailed the Cardinal to complain about his lack of visibility on such issues as discussed by Bishop Strickland here. Funny that since I stopped sending $$$ to the Appeal, the Cardinal's office has reached out to me several times wondering 'why haven't you participated in the Appeal?' (i have upped the $$$ i send to EWTN or 'repair and maintenance' collections). God bless everyone. Pray the Rosary!
Bishop, could you please help me better understand your call to action for the laity?
You ask us to speak up, but what exactly are you asking us to say, and to whom?
Forgive me if this is obvious to others, but I take our duty to honor and obey our clergy very seriously, and would not want to sin by detraction or scandalize others just because I misunderstood.
Bishop Strickland would NEVER want anyone to be disrespectful or unkind. For myself, I am requesting a personal visit with my bishop. I plan to ask him about the situation to gain a better understanding of him and his participation in the current situation in the Church. I will ask him what he expects of me. At that time, I will give him my answer as per the Holy Spirit puts it on my heart.
Prepare yourself for smooth, deceptive words. The vast majority of bishops are neo-modernists, concealing their true intentions behind a facade of false piety whenever they face the laity.
This is my what I’m hoping for clarification on from Bishop Strickland. Is he asserting sedevacantism here, or just saying that people should more strongly rebuke errors from the Pope? Big difference, obviously, and I’m not clear on what he is advocating for from his post.
The Catholic Church cannot give her children evil.
A non Catholic cannot become Pope. Perennial teaching of the Church.
If, A big if, A Pope uttered heresy.. He would lose his office immediately, judged by God. -whether Catholics recognized this or not.
The ones who didn't would be in position 1.3 billion people in Vatican II religion are - saying Jorge is pope, and in dire catch 22 of being a heretic or being a Schismatic. Sspx, for example, claim he's pope, then casually decide what he's saying is Catholic or not. Sspx has no right to do this.
Only sedevacantists. Who are following Catholic teaching, observable facts , logic.
Your words are bold and brave. They encourage us to defend the faith in the same way. We can do no less. Truth Incarnate! Que Viva Cristo Rey!
I love you Bishop Strickland. Thank you for being OUR BISHOP. The Lord has rewards for those like you willing to lose all and die for Him! I'm praying for you every day!
God love you, Bishop Strickland. Thank you for crying out the truth and calling your brother bishops and the faithful to task. May you be blessed and strengthened for the fight to come!
Oh Lord, grant us priests. Oh Lord, grant us many holy priests!!
Let this prayer stay in our daily rosary!!!
God, bless Bishop Strickland abundantly ❤️
Thank you Jesus for giving us Bishop Strickland. He is so very much needed in these dark times.
We need Catholic Clergy who openly renounce Vatican II and false popes who gave us this poison.
Strickland is a heretic. A brave one, but a heretic nonetheless
St John Fisher, pray for us and all bishops of the church, that they may teach the Truth of the faith with fidelity.
The synod is a dumpster fire of bad and manipulated theology all driven by a purely political agenda that emanates from the Francis minions. The USCCB is in "hopefully it will pass over" mode and again exhibits the spine of an earthworm. They may keep their mitres and croziers but they risk losing something else that is infinitely more valuable. We need clarity from the shepherd's. They are to go forth and protect the church from the wolves of the night, not wait and see what happens.
The synod is not Catholic, not run by the Catholic Church
Thank you Bishop Strickland. We are blessed that you are now America’s Bishop 🙏🏻🕊✝️🕊🙏🏻 AMEN
It was a blessing to hear you read this most excellent letter today in Baltimore. May it reach the hearts and minds of your brother bishops! Saints Nathaniel and Jude, pray for us.
The Vatican II Church has no bishops. Heretics lose their office/ never gain their office
Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò explains what is and what is not a schism: “Schism is a sin against the unity of the Church. It is carried out at the moment when a baptized person refuses to submit to the authority of the Roman Pontiff and to remain in the communion of faith and charity of the Catholic Church.
But what happens if on the Chair of Peter there is – instead of a Pope who defends and governs the Church – there is a usurper who systematically demolishes her, and who is chosen and appointed by fraud by the St Gallen Mafia for this very purpose? The Catholic Church is presently occupied by an extraneous body that superimposes itself on her and obscures her, similar to an eclipse: this extraneous body is not the Church, but the anti-church of the False Prophet, and as such it is not possible to be in communion with it.”
The Archbishop points to the position of contemporary Catholics who have become hostages of the apostate Bergoglio. After the release of the Fiducia supplicans declaration, they found themselves in a synodal counterfeit of the Catholic Church proclaiming a sodomite antigospel: “Catholics belong to the Catholic Church, not to its conciliar and synodal counterfeit of which Bergoglio is the head. It is Bergoglio who is in a state of schism with the Church of which he claims to be Pope, and as a heretic and schismatic he does not have nor can he exercise any power, nor demand any obedience.”
Archbishop Viganò speaks about the abuse of the ecclesiastical courts: “I reiterate, however, that the use of the judiciary for political purposes that we witness in the civil sphere, especially in the United States of America, is mirrored in the ecclesiastical sphere through instrumental and specious canonical sanctions.”
The Archbishop points to the precedent-setting and invalid punishment Bergoglio is using to intimidate other bishops and priests into silence: “The excommunication against me, even if manifestly invalid and null and void, constitutes a form of repression of dissent and should serve as a deterrent for others. I am convinced that I would have gravely failed in my duties as Bishop and Successor of the Apostles if I had continued to remain silent, as unfortunately all my confreres do.”
The Archbishop shows that Satan’s influence is most effective when he can abuse official structures: “I would like to draw attention to a fundamental and very important element. We must understand that ‘the masterstroke of Satan’, the sworn enemy of the Church, has occurred by his appropriating authority and abusing the power connected with her, so that his disintegrating action has had all the appearances of at least formal legality.”
Archbishop Viganò compares the Second Vatican Council to a timed mine: “The Second Vatican Council was to be the juridical instrument with which to place the dynamite at the very foundation of the Church, and then detonate it later. It had to look like a Council, it had to give the idea of having the same authority as the Council of Nicaea or Trent, but at the same time it could not define as truths to be believed any heresies that the Magisterium had already condemned.”
Archbishop Viganò emphasizes the Council’s method of covertly promoting heresies, namely the ambiguity of terms: “Thus those errors were insinuated by means of equivocation – deliberately imprecise formulations which at the right moment could serve as a basis on which to implement the revolution. People continue to speak of ‘the Council’, but we should have the honesty to recognize that for the ‘conciliar church’ born with Vatican II there is only one ‘council’, which surpasses in authority and importance all the other twenty ecumenical councils of the Catholic Church. The anomaly is represented by this Council, because it was used for a subversive purpose, under the formal appearance of a solemn act of the Church and with the authoritativeness (as well as the authority) of the Pope and the Council Fathers.”
Archbishop Viganò reveals that the Second Vatican Council created the preconditions for the current Bergoglian revolution within the Church and for the transformation of the Church into a New Age anti-church. It is a Masonic project: “The purpose of Vatican II was to create the doctrinal premises – not necessarily explicit and indeed often hidden in ambiguous formulations – to revolutionize the Church, Protestantizing and secularizing her, so as to be able to ferry her towards the syncretistic union of all religions. And this is the project of Freemasonry: the ecumenical and inclusive Religion of Humanity.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-USC-PT-X_A&ab_channel=PatriarcadoCat%C3%B3licoBizantino
The Vatican is occupied by usurpers.
Catholic Church is outside all this sacrilege.
MT 16:18-19.
Catholic Church cannot be overcome by heresy/ gates of hell.
Jesus is using sedevacantists to keep His Church alive
Thank you for this. Given the priests were given the power to bind and the power to release, and none of us wants to be stuck in hell for doing the right thing and being condemned by a heretical pope, it's good to know he's simply not Pope anymore. Of course, it seemed illogical, but it was a question I had.
No such thing as a heretical pope.
A heretical False pope.
But he's worse, idolatry far worse
bellarmine says anyone who is a formal heretic is automatically excommunicated. thus no heretic, a non-catholic, can be pope. you increase the effect of his sin and apostasy by denying this. logic and tradition should take you one step further to defend the faith.
A layman can and must judge heresy to remove himself from the heretic. Of course sedevacantists aren't talking about a canonical judgment.
We are talking about saving one's soul
People who accept Jorge and the others as popes are in deadly catch 22 of heresy or schism.
May this note find us all ever closer to God, and His Peace.
For a Pope to be Judged a Formal Heretic [as he displays in Scandal often] some Authority in Church above him must do it, or himself must.
Like a murderer we all witness his killing, the killer keeps all his Rights until Judged by court.
God Bless., Steve
You are so wrong.
So, when Jorge utters one of his 100 or more heresies- if you accept, You are a heretic, out of church.
You deny the heresy, While calling him Pope , you are a Schismatic. Out of church.
May this note find us all ever closer to God, and His Peace.
I find Sedeprivationism pretty convincing, it applies to many Church leaders and the Pope. Taking Offices when intending to Betray the duties and oaths, the Church and all of us.
Why do you think I believe that he has the Holy Ghost near, or the Charismas, or Grace that normally he would get when accepting the Papal Office? He is a Modernist, spreading that poison to damage us and the Traditional Catholic Church - after all.
Careful where in the water you dive, you might be wrong and sin.
God Bless., Steve
So a non Catholic cannot gain a Church office.
He might Appear to, but he doesn't.
I ask sedepr this, and get no answer: suppose Jorge renounces all his errors and heresies to the world… I would still reject him as a non Catholic who won Conclave, which means he's an ineligible papal claimant.
Are the sedepr. gonna declare me a non Catholic?
I want nothing from Vatican II harlot church
God bless
if sedes werent so unhinged the pov would be more compelling.
Thank you dear Bishop Strickland for your courage 🙏🙏🙏
i lector at a church in NY and have in past supported Cardinal Dolan's Annual Appeal. in the meantime over these years i have also phoned or emailed the Cardinal to complain about his lack of visibility on such issues as discussed by Bishop Strickland here. Funny that since I stopped sending $$$ to the Appeal, the Cardinal's office has reached out to me several times wondering 'why haven't you participated in the Appeal?' (i have upped the $$$ i send to EWTN or 'repair and maintenance' collections). God bless everyone. Pray the Rosary!
Dolan is Catholic and cardinal😂😂😂😂
Bishop, could you please help me better understand your call to action for the laity?
You ask us to speak up, but what exactly are you asking us to say, and to whom?
Forgive me if this is obvious to others, but I take our duty to honor and obey our clergy very seriously, and would not want to sin by detraction or scandalize others just because I misunderstood.
Bishop Strickland would NEVER want anyone to be disrespectful or unkind. For myself, I am requesting a personal visit with my bishop. I plan to ask him about the situation to gain a better understanding of him and his participation in the current situation in the Church. I will ask him what he expects of me. At that time, I will give him my answer as per the Holy Spirit puts it on my heart.
That sounds like a wise course of action. Thanks for sharing, Marie.
Prepare yourself for smooth, deceptive words. The vast majority of bishops are neo-modernists, concealing their true intentions behind a facade of false piety whenever they face the laity.
The Vatican II Church has no clergy.
Research sedevacantism
This is my what I’m hoping for clarification on from Bishop Strickland. Is he asserting sedevacantism here, or just saying that people should more strongly rebuke errors from the Pope? Big difference, obviously, and I’m not clear on what he is advocating for from his post.
A Pope cannot give pernicious (deadly) errors.
The Catholic Church cannot give her children evil.
A non Catholic cannot become Pope. Perennial teaching of the Church.
If, A big if, A Pope uttered heresy.. He would lose his office immediately, judged by God. -whether Catholics recognized this or not.
The ones who didn't would be in position 1.3 billion people in Vatican II religion are - saying Jorge is pope, and in dire catch 22 of being a heretic or being a Schismatic. Sspx, for example, claim he's pope, then casually decide what he's saying is Catholic or not. Sspx has no right to do this.
Only sedevacantists. Who are following Catholic teaching, observable facts , logic.
Accidentally deleted. Confirmation in today’s reading.
https://bible.usccb.org/bible/titus/3?1
Thank you for giving us hope by broadcasting heart felt truths in defense of our church.
Our church, like our nation, is exposing the weeds & the wheat. May God bless & keep you safe.
Thank you and God bless you! It is SO REFRESHING to hear the TRUTH!